Category Archives: Pseudoscience
It has to be said, everything about the Burzynksi Clinic is a little odd. Donations/payments have to be made to Dr Burzynksi personally (like all reputable organisations?), they have a lawyer who prefers typos and creepy intimidation over any real professional conduct, and they rely on a cancer treatment “breakthrough” they made over thirty years ago but still refuse to publish any randomised and controlled clinical trials in a reputable peer-reviewed scientific journal.
The more we learn about the Burzynksi Clinic, the more we see false hope being used as bait, easy cash being made, and lack of results. If Burzynksi’s treatment isn’t doing any good, it would be worth knowing for sure. That way, people wouldn’t waste so much money on him (and I do mean him, the cheques are payable to him). But even better, what if he really has discovered a cure for cancer? Then isn’t that an even better reason to have the data from his trials? Bogus treatment, or miracle cure, either way the data obviously needs to be shared so it can be evaluated. A petition has been created in order to challenge the Burzynksi Clinic to actually release the data on its clinical trials. Over thirty years since the discovery of their cancer treatment and still no published and peer-reviewed clinical trails in reputable scientific journals demonstrating the efficacy of their expensive treatments. Surely it’s about time they show us what they’ve got?
You can sign the petition here.
I know this bright young chap named Rhys Morgan. He’s your average teenage boy playing videogames, mastering social media, obsessing over technology, studying for exams, and similar activities that I pretend I’ve outgrown. Oh, I forgot to mention, he’s also the scourge of fundamentalists, bullshit-merchants, and woo-purveyors everywhere. You’ve probably seen his name in the news a few times or read about him on other blogs. He was diagnosed with Crohn’s and last year stood up against quacks attempting to sell a miracle cure for Crohn’s, which was literally bleach. Search for “Bleachgate” if you want to know more. It was very refreshing to see someone his age standing up, questioning wild claims, and understanding robust and valid evidence (or the lack of it).
At the start of the week, we received some great news in the UK. The House of Commons published its report on the evidence for homeopathy. The MPs urge that the government withdraws NHS funding for homeopathy. They also propose that the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) shouldn’t allow homeopathic product labels to make medical claims, or claim there are active ingredients when there are not. Read the rest of this entry
Break open a bottle of bubbly, it’s time to celebrate! And remember to dilute the alcohol as much as possible if you want to really get drunk. We’ve been treated to some really exciting news for skeptics, rational thinkers, and the public in general! Today, the House of Commons published its report on an investigation into homeopathy. The MPs urge that the government withdraws NHS funding for homeopathy. This is absolutely fantastic, and it gets even better. Read the rest of this entry
First, let’s clear something up. SETI and CSETI are not the same thing. One does serious science, the other quite simply doesn’t. CSETI describe themselves as an “international nonprofit scientific research and education organization dedicated to the furtherance of our understanding of extraterrestrial intelligence.”
You’ve maybe heard of the founder of CSETI, Dr Steven Greer. He went to the interesting Maharishi University of Management, where they teach “consciousness-based education”. Sounds fun.
Do we really need to do anymore to demonstrate that homeopathy doesn’t work? No. As far as the science goes, the battle is won. It is a demonstrable fact that homeopathic remedies with no active ingredients are unable to cause specific effects. Homeopathy is bogus and anyone who says otherwise is contradicting reality. But what we do need are more ways to demonstrate these facts to the general public who sometimes don’t understand chemistry or medical trials. We need more action that demonstrates how absurd homeopathy is, in such a way that Joe Public can see the lunacy.
The 10:23 campaign has so far been excellent. Forget understanding how the remedies are made, or understanding the natural laws that must be broken for homeopathy to work. The recent “overdosing” by 10:23 volunteers has demonstrated to the general public that the remedies don’t work. If someone overdoses on several bottles of homeopathic sleeping pills and doesn’t even get drowsy, the scam is easily exposed, whether you understand chemistry or not. We need more of these stunts, which get the point across with simple observations rather than explaining the science.
For example, yesterday I thought of another idea. I walked into Boots and looked at the homeopathic remedies on sale. All the different kinds were simply sugar pills, but they all had different labels with different ingredients listed. So product A has a different ingredient than product B and so on. But, because they are homeopathic remedies and not real drugs, they are the exact same products. If our bodies can supposedly tell the difference between a homeopathic remedy designed to help us sleep, and one designed to cure itching, surely technology can also tell the difference. The latest lab technology can spot even the slightest differences in samples.
Perhaps a worthwhile action would be to offer a challenge to homeopathic practitioners that involves them identifying their own products. We could do it ourselves, but letting the homeopathy practitioners do it would be better publicity for whoever wins the challenge. The idea would be to offer unmarked homeopathic remedies to be analysed and see if they can tell which products are which. Ideally, offering a mixture of normal sugar pills, and sugar pills treated with homeopathic remedies would be best. This would be fantastic publicity for the homeopathy loons, as they would have the chance to demonstrate that the nasty, deluded scientists have offered a challenge which was easily beaten. They could show that the homeopathic remedies can be identified among simple sugar pills. It would also be a fantastic opportunity for us to get the message across to the public, when homeopathic practitioners fail a challenge to identify which pills are homeopathic and which are simply sugar. And they will fail, because they will all be the same.
I think more actions like this are required. Even if Joe Public doesn’t understand the chemistry, they will understand when the supporters of homeopathic remedies aren’t even able to tell their own products apart from sugar. Recently, chiropractors published an article demonstrating that a major component of chiropractic healing is bogus. This is brilliant for the general public, and really sinks it home. We need to continue to think “public” and keep it simple. If we could win people over with just the facts and evidence, there wouldn’t be any creationists, faith healers or homeopathic practitioners. Sadly, that isn’t the way it works. I’m hoping the 10:23 campaign will continue to take simple and direct action that gets the message across to everyone.
Are homeopathic remedies really that bad? They are just alternatives. Sure, large brands admit they don’t work, and sell them anyway since they make money. Boots are telling us skeptics that they are aware that homeopathy is nonsense. But in the stores, the customers are reading the labels on these products which list ingredients that aren’t really in there. But this behaviour is demonstrated by many major brands selling all kinds of things. PC World sells a lot of crap computer equipment that is cheap to make and easy to sell. It’s all business.
So when major brands such as Boots admit that homeopathy is nonsense, but choose to sell it anyway, is it really a big problem? Why aren’t skeptics going after the brands that are selling crap bikes, computer parts or vehicle parts when they could sell better ones?
I’ve been receiving a lot of messages recently via email, Facebook and various forums from people making arguments like this. What’s the harm? All companies behave like this. Why an open letter to Boots for the 1023 Campaign? Let people waste their money if they want to.
I think people are missing the bigger picture.
People usually buy certain products for lots of different reasons. But people only buy medicine for one reason. People don’t buy homeopathic remedies for fun. Customers only spend money on medicine if they (or a loved one, friend etc) are ill. When Boots sells homeopathic remedies, the customers are choosing sugar pills and pure water over real medicine. Homeopathy kills. There have plenty of tragic accounts of people taking homeopathic remedies instead of real medicine and dying. One example would be Thomas Sam and his wife Manju who were this year found guilty of allowing their daughter to die of a curable condition back in May 2002. The daughter had eczema. For several months, her parents ignored the advice of doctors and opted for homeopathic remedies instead. They denied their daughter medical attention. Her skin would tear, and she was riddled with infections. Despite being fed well, she was malnourished as her body struggled to cope with the infections. Her immune system was destroyed. She was killed by alternative medicine. Real medicine works, homeopathy is an alternative to working medicine. The 1023 Campaign is essential since major companies are offering sugar pills as alternatives to working medicine, despite being aware of the consequences.
This movement by trusted pharmacies also has negative effects on the public perception of science, skepticism and critical thinking. Scientists are saying the stuff doesn’t work, but Boots says it does. “Trust Boots” is their slogan! People really think that if the homeopathic remedies did nothing, they wouldn’t be sold by such a large brand, and by so many others. Therefore the conclusion is that scientists don’t know what they are talking about. Those pesky scientists always getting in the way, moaning about homeopathy, and climate change, and evolution, and they must not know what they are talking about.
Honestly, I’ve heard this type of argument plenty of times. “Sure. Scientists say it doesn’t work. But if it really didn’t, pharmacies wouldn’t sell it”.
I understand the similarities between a major bike company deliberately selling crap products to maximise profits, and a major pharmacy selling nonsense remedies because the customers want it. But the situation with homeopathy is completely different. Using homeopathy and thinking it is making you better, is like playing air guitar and thinking you’re in a band.
Despite so many people telling me that there’s no harm, I’m sure there are more people out there who agree with what I am saying. If you think Boots shouldn’t be selling homeopathic products, please help by signing the open letter at www.1023.org.uk.
The 10:23 Campaign has finally begun and skeptics can now do their bit to help combat the joke that is homeopathy.
Homeopathic remedies either do nothing, or sometimes have non-specific effects. This is a demonstrable fact. But large pharmacy brands such as Boots (UK) happily stock homeopathic products, while admitting that they know they don’t work. Boots has admitted that they only stock homeopathy products because the “customers believe it works”.
The 10:23 Campaign has made Boots their first target, and you can get involved too. The first action of the campaign is to provide an open letter demanding Boots take the homeopathy products off their shelves. You can get involved and do your bit by signing the open letter which can be found by clicking here.
If you share this post, please add “10:23” at the end. If you tweet it, please use “ten23” as a hashtag. If you are curious what these numbers mean, take a look here.
The 10:23 Campaign website can be found at www.1023.org.uk
Go on, do your bit!